Opinion
CRIMINAL ACTION 4:19-CR-00041-JPB
07-01-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DANIEL LANDA-DUERTA; and JORGE ARMANDO AVALOS-MENERA, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
J. P. BOULEE, United States District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 145]. Neither party filed objections. This Court finds as follows:
A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject or modify a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the Report and Recommendation that is the subject of a proper objection on a de novo basis and any non-objected-to portion under a “clearly erroneous” standard. See also Fed R. Crim. Pro. 59(b)(3). Because no objections have been filed, the Court has reviewed the Final Report and Recommendation for clear error and finds none.
Accordingly, the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 145] as the judgment of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the motions to suppress [Docs. 67 and 68] are DENIED.
SO ORDERED.