From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2013
CR. No. S 12-027 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CR. No. S 12-027 GEB

02-20-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIPPY LAL, Defendant.

MARK AXUP, ESQ. Attny. for Sippy Lal BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney PHILIP A. FERRARI Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN WAGNER
United States Attorney
PHILIP A. FERRARI
MICHELE BECKWITH
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2744

STIPULATION AND ORDER


Date: March 29, 2013

Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America through its attorneys, and defendant Sippy Lal, through his attorney, that the status conference hearing set for February 22, 2013, be vacated, and a status conference hearing be set for March 29, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Mr. Lal's new counsel needs additional time to become familiar with the case and the parties are actively seeking resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding the time between February 22, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The parties request that time be excluded based upon counsel's need for reasonable time to prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (local Code T4).

____________________________

MARK AXUP, ESQ.

Attny. for Sippy Lal

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ____________________________

PHILIP A. FERRARI

Assistant U.S. Attorney

IT IS ORDERED that the status conference currently set for February 22, 2013, is vacated, and a new status conference is set for March 29, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons stipulated to by the parties, good cause exists pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h), and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through March 29, 2013, pursuant to local code T4. For the reasons set forth in the stipulation, the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Lal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2013
CR. No. S 12-027 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Lal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIPPY LAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

CR. No. S 12-027 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)