From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kounitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 5, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA)

03-05-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAROL KOUNITZ, STEPHANIE LIMA, MARK BETHEA, and EUGENE BROWN, a/k/a "Raheem"

Eric W. Moran Matthew J. Skahill Assistant U.S. Attorneys John Holliday, Esq. Counsel for Carol Kounitz Paul W. Norris, Esq. Counsel for Stephanie Lima Kim Augustus Otis, Esq, Counsel for Mark Bethea Bruce Throckmorton, Esq. Counsel for Eugene Brown


Hon. Douglas E. Arpert


CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Eric W. Moran and Matthew J. Skahill, Assistant U.S. Attorneys), and the above captioned defendants through their attorneys, for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, and each of the above captioned defendants and their attorneys having represented to the Government their intention to enter a guilty plea to charges contained in an Information, and each of the above captioned defendants having signed a plea agreement, and each of the above captioned defendants and their attorneys and the Government having represented that additional time is needed to finalize a pre-indictment resolution to the conduct charged in the criminal complaint including scheduling these matters before a United States District Judge; and each defendant being aware that he or she has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days of the date of his or her initial appearance pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and each defendant, whose attorney has signed below, having consented to the continuance and waived such right; and this being the fourth continuance sought by the parties, and for good cause shown;

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) Each defendant, whose attorney has signed below, through his or her counsel, has requested additional time to finalize a pre-indictment resolution to the conduct charged in the criminal complaint;

(2) The United States and the defendant have jointly represented that the parties desire additional time to finalize a pre-indictment resolution to this matter, which would render any subsequent trial of this matter unnecessary; and

(3) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 5th day of March, 2013,

ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued from the date this order is signed through and including April 5, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date this order is signed through and including April 5, 2013 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

_______________

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
_______________
Eric W. Moran
Matthew J. Skahill
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
_______________
John Holliday, Esq.
Counsel for Carol Kounitz
_______________
Paul W. Norris, Esq.
Counsel for Stephanie Lima
_______________
Kim Augustus Otis, Esq,
Counsel for Mark Bethea
_______________
Bruce Throckmorton, Esq.
Counsel for Eugene Brown


Summaries of

United States v. Kounitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 5, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Kounitz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAROL KOUNITZ, STEPHANIE LIMA, MARK BETHEA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2013)