From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kootstra

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2023
1:22-cv-00924-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00924-ADA-CDB

10-11-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiff, v. HOWARD D. KOOTSTRA, et al. Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

(DOC. 10)

On July 26, 2022, Plaintiff Relator LLC, on behalf of himself and the United States of America (“government”), filed a complaint against Defendants Howard D. Kootstra and Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. (Doc. 1).

On April 10, 2023, the Court granted the government's second ex parte application for an order extending its time to notify the Court of any decision it makes concerning intervention in this matter (the “April 10 Order”). (Doc. 11). Pursuant to the April 10 Order, the government's time to either intervene, notify the Court of its declination to take action, or seek an extension of its time to intervene expired on October 10, 2022. (Id. at 2). See 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P 6(a)(1)(C) & (6)(A). That deadline has passed and the government has failed to make any timely filing in compliance with the Court's April 10 Order.

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions.. .within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000).

Because this marks the second time the government's filings in this matter have been untimely (see Doc. 11 at 1), the Court concludes that the imposition of sanctions may be appropriate to compel the government to comply with this Court's orders.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within two days of entry of this order, the United States of America shall show cause in writing why sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal, should not be imposed for its failure to timely comply with this Court's order of April 10, 2023.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the issuance of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kootstra

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2023
1:22-cv-00924-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Kootstra

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiff, v. HOWARD D. KOOTSTRA, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00924-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2023)