From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kolek

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 23, 1984
728 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-5072.

March 23, 1984.

Edward C. Weiner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Michael D. Stein, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before SCHROEDER, FARRIS and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Despite defendant's assertion to the contrary, our jurisdiction over prejudgment bail matters is appellate, not original. See 18 U.S.C. § 3147(b); Fed.R.App.P. 9(a). That jurisdiction is invoked by the filing of a notice of appeal filed within 10 days of the date of entry of the district court's bail order. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(b).

Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over defendant's request for a reduction of bail pending trial. We therefore remand this appeal to the district court to afford defendant an opportunity to demonstrate excusable neglect for his failure to file a timely notice of appeal. See id.; United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108, 111 (9th Cir. 1976).


Summaries of

United States v. Kolek

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 23, 1984
728 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

United States v. Kolek

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOSEPH KOLEK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 23, 1984

Citations

728 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Estela-Melendez

The second motion for reconsideration was denied on January 13, 1989. Counsel did not file a notice of appeal…

U.S. v. Castiello

The motion for reconsideration was denied on May 25, 1989, but defendant's notice of appeal was not filed…