From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kohrt

United States District Court, District of South Dakota
Aug 8, 2022
CR 21-10032 (D.S.D. Aug. 8, 2022)

Opinion

CR 21-10032

08-08-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN DERICK KOHRT, Defendant.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

CHARLES B. KORNMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon motion of the Plaintiff for a preliminary order of forfeiture, the Court finds:

1. As the result of the guilty plea to the Superseding Information for which the United States seeks forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253, the Defendant shall forfeit to the United States a Samsung Galaxy cellular phone, SMS111DL.

2. The Court has determined, based on the Defendant's Plea Agreement and Factual Basis Statement, that he has an interest in the above property, that the property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18U.S.C. §2253, and that the United States has established the requisite nexus between such property and such offenses, and that the above property is property that was used or intended to be used to commit the offense described in the Indictment to which the Defendant has pled guilty.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

1. Upon the entry of this order, the United States is authorized to seize the above property for forfeiture, whether held by the Defendant or by a third party, and to conduct any discovery proper in identifying, locating or disposing of the property subject to forfeiture, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3).

2. Upon the entry of this order, and pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Cases, the United States shall post to www.forfeiture.gov, for a period of thirty consecutive days, notice of this order, notice of the United States' intent to dispose of the property according to law, and notice that any other person, other than the Defendant, having or claiming a legal interest in any of the above-listed forfeited property must file a petition with this court within thirty days of the final publication of notice, or receipt of actual notice whichever is earlier.

3. Further, the notice shall state that the petition shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the Petitioner's alleged interest in the property, shall be signed by the Petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the Petitioner's right, title or interest in the forfeited property, and any additional facts supporting the Petitioner's claim, and the relief sought.

4. The United States may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is identified, above, as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified.

5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c)(2), if no third party files a timely petition, this preliminary order becomes the final order of forfeiture.


Summaries of

United States v. Kohrt

United States District Court, District of South Dakota
Aug 8, 2022
CR 21-10032 (D.S.D. Aug. 8, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Kohrt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN DERICK KOHRT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of South Dakota

Date published: Aug 8, 2022

Citations

CR 21-10032 (D.S.D. Aug. 8, 2022)