From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Knisley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 14, 2014
Case No.: 3:12-CR-139 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12-CR-139

04-14-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA E. KNISLEY, Defendant.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 51)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 51), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(6) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 59. Noting that no objections have been filed thereto and, further, that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) has expired, and having also conducted a de novo review of the record as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(6), the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in full. The Court will issue an Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case incorporating the Magistrate Judge's restitution determination.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Knisley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 14, 2014
Case No.: 3:12-CR-139 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Knisley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA E. KNISLEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 14, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 3:12-CR-139 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 2014)