From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kneedler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
166 F. App'x 987 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

James P. Hagarty, Esq., USYA--Office of The U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory L. Scott, Esq., Attorney at Law, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-02082-WFN.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Nathaniel Shay Kneedler appeals from the guilty-plea conviction and sentence imposed for distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Kneedler has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a

Page 988.

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Kneedler has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Kneedler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
166 F. App'x 987 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Kneedler

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Nathaniel Shay KNEEDLER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

166 F. App'x 987 (9th Cir. 2006)