From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kiyak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2013
No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM

02-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CEM KIYAK, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant CEM KIYAK


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
CEM KIYAK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDE TIME


Date: February 19, 2013

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Cem Kiyak, that the status conference scheduled for February 19, 2013, may be continued to March 26, 2013, at 9:45 a.m.

The defense met with Customs two weeks ago to review additional seized paperwork; that review raised additional questions, which the parties are reviewing. Additional time is needed to answer these questions before the case may be resolved or further scheduled. The parties agree that additional time is needed to review and resolve the case and that the interests of justice to be served by a continuance therefore outweigh the best interests of the parties in a speedy trial, so that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on March 26, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

T. Zindel for T. Pickles

TODD PICKLES

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

____________________

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for CEM KIYAK

ORDER

The status conference is continued to March 26, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. Time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the reasons stated above and by agreement of the parties, the Court finding that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Kiyak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2013
No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Kiyak

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CEM KIYAK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-0274 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)