From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kirk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-0081 LJO / BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-0081 LJO / BAM

05-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH KIRK, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DAVID L. GAPPA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff HEATHER E. WILLIAMS Federal Defender PEGGY SASSO CHARLES J. LEE Assistant Federal Defenders Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH KIRK


HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Bar #122664
Federal Defender
PEGGY SASSO, Bar #228906
CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #254302
Assistant Federal Defenders
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH KIRK

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SECOND

STATUS CONFERENCE;

ORDER


Date: June 10, 2013

Judge: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney David L. Gappa, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defenders Peggy Sasso and Charles J. Lee, Counsel for Defendant Christopher Joseph Kirk, that the hearing currently set for May 13, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. before Judge McAuliffe, may be rescheduled to June 10, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.

The government communicated a plea offer on May 7, 2013. Additional time is needed for defense counsel to review the offer with Mr. Kirk, consider the forensic evidence, and engage in further discussions with the government in an attempt to resolve the case without a trial. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice herein and for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv) because the ends of justice served in granting such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_____________

DAVID L. GAPPA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS

Federal Defender

_____________

PEGGY SASSO

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defenders

Attorneys for Defendant

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH KIRK

ORDER

This case is continued until June 10, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. and the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice and for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv) because the ends of justice served in granting such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. If the parties are able to reach a plea agreement before June 10, 2013, they should schedule the matter for a change of plea in district court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Kirk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-0081 LJO / BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Kirk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH KIRK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-0081 LJO / BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)