From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kinsfather

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0058 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0058 KJM

10-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ALAN KINSFATHER, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KYLE REARDON Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KYLE REARDON

MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT AND

ORDER DISMISSING INDICTMENT

Pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby files this motion and proposed order dismissing the indictment against the defendant in the above-captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ____


Summaries of

United States v. Kinsfather

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0058 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Kinsfather

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ALAN KINSFATHER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0058 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc.

1-800 argues that courts in similar situations favor transfer. See, e.g., Von Der Werth v. Johns Manville…