From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cr-24 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cr-24

12-05-2013

United States of America, v. Terrance J. King


JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts Four, Eight and Ten of the Indictment. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense.

I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty plea.

The defendant remains on bond pending sentencing.

Terence P. Kemp

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cr-24 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. King

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, v. Terrance J. King

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cr-24 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2013)