From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
Case No.: 2:10-CR-0059-01 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10-CR-0059-01

03-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN JAMES KING, Defendant.

NUTTALL & COLEMAN ROGER T. NUTTALL Attorneys for Defendant, STEVEN KING OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY MATT SEGAL Assistant U.S. Attorney


ROGER T. NUTTALL, #42500

NUTTALL & COLEMAN

2445 CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 150

FRESNO, CA 93721

PHONE (559) 233-2900

FAX (559) 485-3852
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant,

STEVEN JAMES KING

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING HEARING AND

SENTENCING SCHEDULE AND

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for May 29, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. be continued to June 11, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton to allow counsel for Defendant to attend this hearing in Sacramento. Counsel for Defendant had a calendar conflict with the May 29, 2013, sentencing date.

IT IS ALSO HEREBY STIPULATED that the following proposed sentencing schedule be followed:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦The proposed Presentence Report shall be disclosed to counsel no ¦April ¦ ¦later than: ¦30, 2013¦ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+--------¦ ¦Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report shall be ¦May 14, ¦ ¦delivered to the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later ¦2013 ¦ ¦than: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦The Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to¦May 21,¦ ¦counsel no later than: ¦2013 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Motion for Correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with ¦May 28,¦ ¦the Court and served on the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no¦2013 ¦ ¦later than: ¦ ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦Reply, or Statement of Non-Opposition: ¦June 4,¦ ¦ ¦2013 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦ ¦June ¦ ¦Judgment and Sentencing Date: ¦11, ¦ ¦ ¦2013 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Under the circumstances set forth herein, it is respectfully suggested that good cause does exist for a continuance to the hereinabove noted date. Counsel's office has communicated with Assistant U.S. Attorney Matt Segal and with Senior Deputy Probation Officer Scott Storey, who have expressed no objection to the instant request.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

NUTTALL & COLEMAN

By ______________________

ROGER T. NUTTALL

Attorneys for Defendant,

STEVEN KING

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY

By ______________________

MATT SEGAL

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled on May 29, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., is continued to June 11, 2013, at 9:15 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-proposed sentencing schedule shall be followed.

______________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
Case No.: 2:10-CR-0059-01 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. King

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN JAMES KING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:10-CR-0059-01 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)