From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Juarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-MJ-00207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-MJ-00207-EFB

01-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Bobby Juarez Defendant

THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203 Attorney for Defendant Bobby Juarez BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney


THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203
Attorney for Defendant Bobby Juarez

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME


Date: February 8, 2013

Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the preliminary hearing currently set for January 11, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. is continued to February 8, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d).

It is further stipulated that good cause exists to extend the time for the preliminary hearing within the meaning of Rule 5.1(d). The parties further stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding time from January 11, 2013 to February 8, 2013 so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The defendant, defense counsel and the government stipulate and agree that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(A); Local Code T-4, preparation of counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: ______________

THOMAS A. JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

Bobby Juarez

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ______________

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the Preliminary Hearing scheduled for January 11, 2013 is continued to February 8, 2013. It is further ORDERED that the time under the Speedy Trial Act between today's date and February 8, 2013, is excluded under Local Code T-4, and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) to ensure adequate time for preparation of counsel. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time through February 8, 2013

______________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Juarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-MJ-00207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Juarez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Bobby Juarez Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-MJ-00207-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)