From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 25, 2013
2:12-CR-00063-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-CR-00063-PMP-CWH

03-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LELAND JONES, ROSS HACK and MELISSA HACK, Defendants.


ORDER

On March 21, 2013, Defendant Leland Jones filed a document titled "Motion to Join as Co-Counsel" (Doc. #109) and a document titled "Demand for Production" (Doc. #110).

Defendant Leland Jones is represented by counsel. As a result, he may not file motions, pro se, without leave of the Court. The Court finds no good cause presented herein and directs that Defendant Leland Jones consult with his counsel regarding any future motions which he thinks should be filed in this case, including the motions described above. For the foregoing reasons, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED Defendant Leland Jones' pro se Motion to Join as Co-Counsel (Doc. #109) and Demand for Production (Doc. #110) are hereby STRICKEN.

_____________

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 25, 2013
2:12-CR-00063-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LELAND JONES, ROSS HACK and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

2:12-CR-00063-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2013)