From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 15, 2012
Criminal No. 12-94 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 12-94 (DWF/AJB)

06-15-2012

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Brady Anthony Johnson, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated May 23, 2012. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Chief Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Brady Anthony Johnson's Motion to Suppress Eyewitness Identifications (Doc. No. [19]) is DENIED.

2. Defendant Brady Anthony Johnson's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. [20]) is DENIED.

3. Defendant Brady Anthony Johnson's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. [21]) is DENIED.

_______________

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 15, 2012
Criminal No. 12-94 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Brady Anthony Johnson, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 15, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 12-94 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2012)