From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
No. 2:12-cr-00250 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cr-00250 TLN

05-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. XAVIER JOHNSON, KRISTIN M. CALDWELL, WILLIAM L. BROWN. Defendants.

KYLE KNAPP Attorney for Defendant XAVIER JOHNSON Kyle Knapp for KELLY BABINEAU Attorney for Defendant KRISTIN CALDWELL Kyle Knapp for WILLIAM H. DU BOIS Attorney for Defendant WILLIAM BROWN U.S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE by: /s/ Kyle Knapp for MATTHEW MORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


KYLE R. KNAPP (SBN 166597)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1120 D Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA. 95814
Tel. (916) 441-4717
Fax (916) 441-4299
E-Mail: kyleknapp@sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Defendant
XAVIER JOHNSON

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND TO EXCLUDE TIME


Judge: Honorable Troy L. Nunley

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, together with Kyle Knapp, attorney for defendant, Xavier Johnson, and Kelly Babineau, attorney for defendant Kristin Caldwell, and William Du Bois attorney for William Brown, that the previously scheduled status conference date, currently set for May 8, 2013, be vacated and that the matter be set for status conference on June 20, 2013 at 9:30am.

This continuance is requested to allow defense counsel additional time to analyze the discovery in this matter and to potentially negotiate plea agreements. The government concurs with this request.

Further, the parties agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B) (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, May 6, 2013 to and including June 20, 2013.

Accordingly, the remaining parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

____________

KYLE KNAPP

Attorney for Defendant

XAVIER JOHNSON

Kyle Knapp for

KELLY BABINEAU

Attorney for Defendant

KRISTIN CALDWELL

Kyle Knapp for

WILLIAM H. DU BOIS

Attorney for Defendant

WILLIAM BROWN

U.S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

by: /s/ Kyle Knapp for

MATTHEW MORRIS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the case is complex and that a failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, May 6, 2013 to and including June 20, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), Local Code T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare).

It is further ordered that the May 8, 2013, status conference date be continued to June 20, 2013 at 9:30am.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
No. 2:12-cr-00250 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. XAVIER JOHNSON, KRISTIN M…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cr-00250 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)