From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH
Nov 5, 2018
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-10-TBR (W.D. Ky. Nov. 5, 2018)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-10-TBR

11-05-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. KEITH LAWRENCE JOHNSON, JR., DEFENDANT

cc: Counsel of Record Keith Lawrence Johnson, Jr., pro se 33396-058 BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 1600 BUTNER, NC 27509


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Keith Johnson's Motion for Clarification of the Record. [R. 41.] Plaintiff United States responded. [R. 42.] This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons stated herein, Johnson's Motion for Clarification of the Record, [R. 41], is DENIED. Johnson's previous Motion for Clarification of the Record, [R. 39], is DENIED AS MOOT.

On November 30, 2017, Johnson was committed to the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of twenty-four months with four years of supervised release upon release from imprisonment. [R. 35 at 3-4 (Judgment and Commitment Order).] In his motion before the Court, Johnson "contends that the record has failed to indicate or allege that he received the nine (9) month jail credit while in the Federal Detention Center Holding facilities." [R. 41 at 1.] Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, he asks that the Court "GRANT his request for clarification of the Record and issue an Order granting him the jail credit." [Id.] The United States responds that "[o]nly the Bureau of Prisons, and not the district court, is authorized to grant credit for time served under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)." [R. 42 at 1 (quoting United States v. Jefferson, 507 F. App'x 509, 510 (6th Cir. 2012)).] The Court agrees with the United States.

Although Johnson makes his motion pursuant to Rule 36, "a claim for credit for time served is not cognizable in a proceeding pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36." Addison v. United States, 2 F.3d 1151 (6th Cir. 1993) (unpublished). Furthermore, the Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons, has exclusive authority to compute and apply credit for time served. United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992). Any request for jail credit must therefore be directed to the Bureau of Prisons. Thus, Johnson's Motion for Clarification, [R. 41], is DENIED.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Johnson's Motion for Clarification, [R. 41], is DENIED. As Johnson's previous Motion for Clarification, [R. 39], is the same motion, only with no signature, it is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge

United States District Court

November 5, 2018 cc: Counsel of Record Keith Lawrence Johnson, Jr., pro se
33396-058
BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 1600
BUTNER, NC 27509


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH
Nov 5, 2018
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-10-TBR (W.D. Ky. Nov. 5, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. KEITH LAWRENCE JOHNSON, JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

Date published: Nov 5, 2018

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-10-TBR (W.D. Ky. Nov. 5, 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Edwards

Also, “a claim for credit for time served is not cognizable in a proceeding pursuant to [Rule 36].” Addison…