From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2012
3:11-cr-00012-28 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cr-00012-28

10-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DMITRI JOHNSON, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is a letter from Defendant Johnson, Document #1255, and the Government's response, Document #1268.

Defendant Johnson complains that he was not presented to a Magistrate Judge within 48 hours. He requests a hearing under Gerstein v. Pugh. Such a hearing is unnecessary and Mr. Johnson's complaint is denied. Defendant was presented to Magistrate Judge Knowles on the first work day after his arrest.

Furthermore, the circumstances of this take down of multiple defendants are extraordinary and justify any delay.

It is so ORDERED.

________________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2012
3:11-cr-00012-28 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DMITRI JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

3:11-cr-00012-28 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)