From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jobe

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 2003
81 F. App'x 221 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted November 10, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; David A. Ezra, Chief District Judge, Presiding.

J. Michael Seabright, U.S. Attorney's Office, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alexander Silvert, Appointed Fed. Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.


Before KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Steven Jobe appeals the district court's judgment revoking probation and imposing a 24-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to a counterfeiting conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jobe's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Jobe

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 2003
81 F. App'x 221 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Jobe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Steven JOBE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2003

Citations

81 F. App'x 221 (9th Cir. 2003)