From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct 4, 2019
No. 19-11226 (11th Cir. Oct. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-11226

10-04-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CEDRIC ANTONIO JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00214-RAL-MAP-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Donna Elm, appointed counsel for Cedric Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson's revocation of supervised release and sentence imposed upon revocation are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct 4, 2019
No. 19-11226 (11th Cir. Oct. 4, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CEDRIC ANTONIO JACKSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 4, 2019

Citations

No. 19-11226 (11th Cir. Oct. 4, 2019)