From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ivra

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 15, 2023
4:18-cr-476-DPM-1 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2023)

Opinion

4:18-cr-476-DPM-1

11-15-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS ADRINE IVRA, Reg. No. 31072-076, DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

Motions, Doc. 60 & 62, denied. I cannot, as a general matter, reduce a term of imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). There are two exceptions to this rule: compassionate release and changes to the sentencing guidelines. Neither applies.

Ivra didn't exhaust his administrative rights before filing his motions. See 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A). The exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional. Doc. 197 in United States v. Cox, Case No. 4:98-cr-73-DPM (E.D. Ark. 8 September 2020). And, regardless, Irva hasn't shown any extraordinary and compelling reasons that could warrant a reduction of his sentence. There are no grounds for compassionate release.

The Sentencing Guidelines were recently amended. Some changes will be applied retroactively. But none of these changes apply to Irva. He was sentenced to the ten-year mandatory minimum.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Ivra

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 15, 2023
4:18-cr-476-DPM-1 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Ivra

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS ADRINE IVRA, Reg…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 15, 2023

Citations

4:18-cr-476-DPM-1 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 15, 2023)