From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ivory

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 3, 1972
468 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-2368. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

November 3, 1972.

M. Howard Williams, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

William H. Stafford, Jr., U.S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., Stewart J. Carrouth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.



Ivory appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts entered on a jury verdict of guilty of passing and possessing counterfeit money in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. Without having moved for a judgment of acquittal in the district court, Ivory seeks reversal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a conviction under either count. We affirm.

In a long unbroken line of cases, United States v. Hopkins, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 1353, being the most recent, we have adhered to the principle that "[i]n such a case our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited to a determination of whether there has occurred a `manifest miscarriage of justice.' We have held that such a miscarriage would exist only if it appears that the record is `devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.'" Id. at 1354 (footnotes omitted).

The evidence before the jury in this case not only pointed to guilt, it was overwhelming.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Ivory

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 3, 1972
468 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Ivory

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BOBBY ANDREW IVORY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1972

Citations

468 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Williams

Williams did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence in the district court; therefore, our inquiry on…

U.S. v. Shaw

In this procedural posture, we can uphold Shaw's sufficiency of the evidence claim on appeal only if "`there…