Opinion
6:22-cr-60033
07-03-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENT v. TRAVIS LEE INGRAM MOVANT
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 39. Judge Bryant recommends that the Court deny Travis Lee Ingram's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 34 No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Ingram's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (ECF No. 34) is DENIED.
When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11, Rules Governing § 2255 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). To make such a showing, “[t]he petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). In this case, the Court finds no issue on which Petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED