Opinion
No. 12-50265 D.C. No. 3:08-cr-01170-L-1 No. 12-50266 D.C. No. 3:11-cr-02653-WQH-1
08-20-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSE SILVINO IBARRA-MURIETTA, aka Jose Silvino Ortiz-Castaneda, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding
Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Jose Silvino Ibarra-Murietta appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111; and being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ibarra's 87-month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.
The district court also did not abuse its discretion in imposing the 24-month sentence upon revocation of supervised release. See id. Contrary to Ibarra's contention, the sentence is substantively reasonable and the district court properly considered Ibarra's prior violent crimes in assessing the need to protect the public from further crimes. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e).
AFFIRMED.