From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Huntsman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. 2:08-CR-00091 MCE (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:08-CR-00091 MCE

05-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAYNA LYN HUNTSMAN, Defendant.

TASHA PARIS CHALFANT (SBN 207055) THE LAW OFFICES OF TASHA PARIS CHALFANT Attorney for Defendant DAYNA LYN HUNTSMAN CHRISTIAAN HIGHSMITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for the United States


TASHA PARIS CHALFANT (SBN 207055)
THE LAW OFFICES OF TASHA PARIS CHALFANT
Attorney for Defendant
DAYNA LYN HUNTSMAN

STIPULATION REGARDING

CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL

APPEARANCE/REVOCATION;

FINDINGS AND ORDER THEREON


STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for an Initial Appearance/Revocation hearing on April 11, 2013. By the court's own motion, the matter was continued to May 9, 2013.

2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the Initial Appearance/Revocation hearing until June 13, 2013. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. Counsel for the defendant desires additional time to consult with her client, to review the current charges and to discuss the charges pending in state court with the state court lawyer who has indicated the preliminary hearing is scheduled later this month. Those charges are the basis for the revocation hearing and all counsel need to coordinate any in custody issues and potential resolutions between the state and federal matters.

b. Counsel for the defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and allow for the state court matter upon which this revocation is based to potentially resolve.

c. The government does not object to the continuance.

d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public to a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

U.S. ATTORNEY

by: _______________

CHRISTIAAN HIGHSMITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

_______________

TASHA PARIS CHALFANT

Attorney for Defendant

DAYNA LYN HUNTSMAN

ORDER

In accordance with the parties' stipulation, the status conference in this matter is hereby continued from May 9, 2013 to June 13, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Huntsman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. 2:08-CR-00091 MCE (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Huntsman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAYNA LYN HUNTSMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. 2:08-CR-00091 MCE (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)