From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Houston

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 12, 1954
216 F.2d 440 (6th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 12059.

October 12, 1954.

Warren E. Burger, Washington, D.C., Fred Elledge, Jr., Nashville, Tenn. (Samuel D. Slade and Benjamin Forman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant.

Frierson Queener, W.A. Richardson and Thos. E. Humphrey, Jr., Columbia, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


In this case the district court reviewed an award of indemnity made by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs under the Servicemen's Indemnity Act of 1951, 38 U.S.C.A. § 851 et seq. The court entered a judgment directing the United States to pay the indemnity to specified parties and to pay a fee to the attorneys of the successful parties. It is evident from a careful examination of the relevant statutes that unlike the National Service Life Insurance Act, 38 U.S.C.A. § 817, a district court is without jurisdiction to review an award made by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs under the Servicemen's Indemnity Act of 1951, 38 U.S.C.A. § 11a-2. See Brewer v. United States, D.C.Tenn., 117 F. Supp. 842. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed with direction to dismiss the complaint.


Summaries of

United States v. Houston

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 12, 1954
216 F.2d 440 (6th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

United States v. Houston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Henry HOUSTON, Janie Pearl…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 12, 1954

Citations

216 F.2d 440 (6th Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Acker v. United States

"This Court is without jurisdiction to review the decision of the Administrator of Veterans Affairs or to…

Wilkinson v. United States

The 1951 statute created a "contract of insurance" as much as such a relationship is possible between the…