From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hopkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 8, 2016
No. 2:15-CR-8-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-CR-8-F-1

08-08-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DWAYNE J. HOPKINS, Defendants.


ORDER

Before the court is the Government's Consent Motion to Lift Stay and Set Arraignment and Trial. [DE 29]. On August 31, 2015, the court stayed all proceedings in this case pending the Fourth Circuit's rulings in United States v. Bryan Daniels (Case No. 4:14-CR-11-F), United States v. Stephen Daniels (Case No. 2:15-CR-4-F), United States v. Michael Potter (Case No. 2:15-CR-6-F), and United States v. Gaston Saunders (Case No. 4:14-CR-8-F). [DE 25]. The Fourth Circuit recently issued its mandate in each of those matters.

The Government requests that Defendant's arraignment and trial date be set for the February 16, 2017 term of court. The Government advises that in light of the recent appointment of new defense counsel and the voluminous discovery production in the case, the parties need time to negotiate a potential resolution of the case, and if negotiations prove unsuccessful, to prepare for trial in light of the unusual and complex nature of the prosecution, taking into account the exercise of due diligence by both sides.

The February 2016 term of court is set for February 13, 2016. --------

For good cause shown, the motion is ALLOWED. All pretrial motions, including motions to compel discovery, motions to suppress, and motions under Rule 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 41, Fed. R. Crim. P., shall be filed no later than December 9, 2016. Responses thereto shall be filed no later than December 23, 2016. Defendant's arraignment and trial date is continued to the February 13, 2017 term of court.

For the reasons stated above, the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the period of delay necessitated by this continuance is excluded from the speedy trial computation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO ORDERED.

This the 8th day of August, 2016.

/s/_________

JAMES C. FOX

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hopkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 8, 2016
No. 2:15-CR-8-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Hopkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DWAYNE J. HOPKINS, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 8, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-CR-8-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016)