From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2021
No. 20-7387 (4th Cir. May. 24, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-7387

05-24-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RYAN LAMAR HOLLAND, Defendant - Appellant.

EJ Hurst II, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Matthew G. T. Martin, United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00445-TDS-1) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. EJ Hurst II, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Matthew G. T. Martin, United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Lamar Holland appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Holland, No. 1:10-cr-00445-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2021
No. 20-7387 (4th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RYAN LAMAR HOLLAND…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 24, 2021

Citations

No. 20-7387 (4th Cir. May. 24, 2021)