From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 28, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cr-034 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cr-034

02-28-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HILL, et al., Defendants.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING ROBERT HILL'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS (Doc. #93) AS MOOT

In this Motion To Suppress, Robert Hill challenges the admissibility of any evidence gained as a result of the searches of the cell phones seized in the June 8, 2011 and March 19, 2012 incidents. The Government has responded that, although it intends to introduce at trial these cell phones as well as the fact of their seizure from Robert Hill, it will not use in its case-in-chief at trial any content recovered from these cell phones. (Doc. #160.)

Since the Government has represented to the Court that it does not intend to use evidence gained as a result of its searches of the cell phones seized in the June 8, 2011 and March 19, 2012 incidents in its case-in-chief, Robert Hill's Motion To Suppress is moot. Therefore, Robert Hill's Motion To Suppress is overruled as being moot.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio this Twenty-Eighth Day of February, 2013.

______________________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

United States v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 28, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cr-034 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HILL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cr-034 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 28, 2013)