From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. 12-039 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-039 GEB

01-17-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE HERNANDEZ-GARCIA Defendant.

MARK J. REICHEL Attorney for defendant BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


MARK J. REICHEL, State Bar #155034
REICHEL & PLESSER L.L.P.
455 CAPITOL MALL, 3rd FLOOR, Suite 350
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-9258
FAX: (916) 441-6553
mark@reichellaw.com
www.reichellaw.com
Attorney for Defendant
JOSE HERNANDEZ -GARCIA

STIPULATION; ORDER THEREON


Date: January 25, 2013

Judge: HONORABLE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHAEL BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present dates for the status hearing be re calendared for January 25, 2013.

This continuance is requested as defense counsel needs adequate time to prepare for the case, and the defense is still reviewing the discovery and will be researching matters. As well, defense counsel will be in negotiations with the government in an effort to resolve the case.

Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation was agreed upon, December 14, 2012, through January 25, 2013, should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

Respectfully submitted,

MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ.

__________________

MARK J. REICHEL

Attorney for defendant

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MARK J. REICHEL for:

MICHAEL BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

____________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. 12-039 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE HERNANDEZ-GARCIA Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-039 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)