From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Carbajal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 18-7534 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7534

04-30-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSE HERNANDEZ-CARBAJAL, Defendant - Appellant.

Jose Hernandez-Carbajal, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:00-cr-00297-TDS-1; 1:17-cv-01057-TDS-LPA) Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Hernandez-Carbajal, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jose Hernandez-Carbajal seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely Hernandez-Carbajal's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hernandez-Carbajal has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Carbajal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 18-7534 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Carbajal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7534 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)