From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 28, 2015
15-cr-018 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, ALEXANDRA P. NEGIN, Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant HAMMURABI HERNANDEZ.

          GILBERT ROQUE, Attorney for Defendant JORGE MEDINA.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE BRIEFING SCHEDULE & SET STATUS CONFERENCE

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin Wagner, U.S. Attorney, through Paul Hemesath, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender, Alexandra P. Negin, attorney for Hammurabi Hernandez, and defendant, Jorge Medina, by and through his counsel Gilbert Roque hereby stipulate and agree to vacate the current status conference set for November 5, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. and set a Change of Plea hearing for both defendants on November 19, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

         Speedy trial time has previously been excluded until November 19, 2015 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders the change of plea hearing set for November 19, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. The Court orders the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including November 19, 2015, excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7), and Local Code T4.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 28, 2015
15-cr-018 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HAMMURABI HERNANDEZ and JORGE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

15-cr-018 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)