From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
Crim. No. 07-246 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. No. 07-246 Civ. No. 12-1959

11-28-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH JOHN HENDRIX


ORDER

Petitioner has filed a pro se § 2255 petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. (Doc. No. 106.) The Government has moved to dismiss. (Doc. No. 109.) Because I have appointed counsel to represent Petitioner in this matter, I will dismiss the pro se petition without prejudice to Petitioner filing a counseled petition.

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that the pro se § 2255 petition (Doc. No. 106) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a counseled petition. The Government's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 109) is DENIED as moot.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Paul S. Diamond, J.


Summaries of

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
Crim. No. 07-246 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hendrix

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH JOHN HENDRIX

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

Crim. No. 07-246 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)