From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Heavy MacHinery Performa Akira Seiki Date 2000

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 16, 2015
2:14-mc-00089-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for the United States.

          Mark Reichel, Attorney for claimants, Dean Wilson and Lisa Wilson, (Authorized by email).


          STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimants Dean Wilson and Lisa Wilson ("claimants"), by and through their respective attorneys, as follows:

         1. On or about March 25, 2014, claimants filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture proceeding with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") with respect to the Heavy Machinery listed above (hereafter "defendant properties"), which were seized on or about October 9, 2013.

         2. The ATF has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant properties under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than claimants has filed a claim to the defendant properties as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.

         3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceeding, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was June 23, 2014.

         4. By Stipulation and Order filed June 25, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to September 22, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

         5. By Stipulation and Order filed September 22, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to December 22, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

         6. By Stipulation and Order filed on or about December 12, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to March 23, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

         7. By Stipulation and Order filed on or about March 20, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend to June 19, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

         8. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend to July 20, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

         9. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to July 20, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Heavy MacHinery Performa Akira Seiki Date 2000

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 16, 2015
2:14-mc-00089-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Heavy MacHinery Performa Akira Seiki Date 2000

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HEAVY MACHINERY PERFORMA AKIRA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 16, 2015

Citations

2:14-mc-00089-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2015)