From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haynes

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 18, 2021
19-cr-0250 (WMW/ECW) (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

19-cr-0250 (WMW/ECW)

11-18-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Johnnie Lamar Haynes 1 and Cortez Lamon Shipp 2, Defendants.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Plaintiff United States of America for a preliminary order of forfeiture. (Dkt. 242.) The Court finds that the property at issue is subject to forfeiture, 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and that the United States has established the requisite nexus between such property and the offense of which Defendants Johnnie Lamar Haynes and Cortez Lamon Shipp have been found guilty.

Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff United States of America's Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, (Dkt. 242), is GRANTED.

2. Defendants Johnnie Lamar Haynes and Cortez Lamon Shipp shall forfeit to the United States three rounds of 9-millimeter ammunition seized on August 5, 2019 (the Property), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

3. The United States Attorney General or an authorized designee may seize and maintain custody and control of the Property pending the entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture.

4. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the United States shall publish and give notice of this Order and the intent of the United States to dispose of the Property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct.

5. This Order shall become final as to each Defendant at the time of sentencing, made part of the sentences and included in the judgment. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A), (B).

6. Following the Court's disposition of any petitions filed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2) or, if no petitions are filed, following the expiration of the time period established to file such petitions, the United States shall have clear title to the Property and may warrant good title to any subsequent purchaser or transferee.

7. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and to amend it as necessary. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).


Summaries of

United States v. Haynes

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 18, 2021
19-cr-0250 (WMW/ECW) (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Johnnie Lamar Haynes 1 and Cortez…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

19-cr-0250 (WMW/ECW) (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2021)