From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hatcher

United States District Court for Middle District of Tennessee
Dec 10, 2012
Case Number: 3:09-00105-01 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 3:09-00105-01

12-10-2012

USA v. Phillip Hatcher

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Brent A. Hannafan Defense Attorney: Jack D. Lowery


Report on Offender Under Supervision

Name of Judicial Officer: The Honorable Aleta A. Trauger, U.S. District Judge Date of Original Sentence: July 21, 2010 Original Offense: 21 U.S.C. § 846. Conspiracy to Manufacture. Distribute, and Possess with Intent to Distribute Anabolic Steroids Original Sentence: 4 months' custody; 2 years' supervised release Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Commenced: February 18. 2011 Assistant U.S. Attorney: Brent A. Hannafan Defense Attorney: Jack D. Lowery

THE COURT ORDERS:

[X] No Action
[ ] Submit a Petition for Summons
[ ] Submit a Petition for Warrant
[ ] Other

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true andcorrect. Respectfully submitted, Considered this 10th day of Dec., 2012,
and made a part of the records in the above case.

___________

U.S. Probation Officer

Jon R. Hahn
___________

U. S. District Judge

Aleta A. Trauger

Place Columbia, Tennessee

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision:

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Violation¦Nature of Noncompliance ¦ ¦No. ¦ ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance: ¦ ¦ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦1. ¦On December 3, 2012, Phillip Hatcher submitted a urine screen. He then ¦ ¦ ¦admitted to injecting steroids into his body for a period of 6 weeks and ¦ ¦ ¦advised he stopped approximately 3-4 weeks ago. ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Compliance with Supervision Conditions and Prior Interventions: Mr. Hatcher has been on supervision since February 18, 2011, and this is his first violation. Due to his previous compliance, he was moved to the Compliant Caseload on August 22, 2011. Due to his admittance to using steroids, he is being moved back to the general caseload and will be sent for a drug intake and assessment. Mr. Hatcher is currently employed and resides with his girlfriend. U.S. Probation Officer Recommendation: It is recommended that Mr. Hatcher be continued on supervised release. The U.S. Attorney's Office agrees with the probation officer's recommendation. Approved: ___________

Kenneth Parham

Supervisory U.S. Probation Officer


Summaries of

United States v. Hatcher

United States District Court for Middle District of Tennessee
Dec 10, 2012
Case Number: 3:09-00105-01 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hatcher

Case Details

Full title:USA v. Phillip Hatcher

Court:United States District Court for Middle District of Tennessee

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 3:09-00105-01 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)