Opinion
18-cr-00219-PJH-1
02-01-2024
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE
RE: DKT. NO. 275
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant Ali Mugalli Hassan has filed a pro se motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See Dkt. 275. Defendant's motion also asks that the court appoint counsel in connection with his motion. See id. at 1.
The Office of the Federal Public Defender has filed a statement indicating that “it does not intend to assume representation of Mr. Hassan,” and that it “takes no position on his motion.” See Dkt. 276 at 1.
There is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel with respect to a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-513 (9th Cir. 1996). Nor is there a statutory right to counsel in connection with a motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). “A person for whom counsel is appointed shall be represented at every stage of the proceedings from his initial appearance ... through appeal, including ancillary matters appropriate to the proceedings.” 18 U.S.C. 3006A(c). A motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) does not constitute an “ancillary matter[ ]” requiring counsel to be appointed. See, e.g., United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007 (5th Cir. 1995).
Because defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel for purposes of filing a motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the court will allow defendant's pro se motion to go forward.
The court sets briefing deadlines on defendant's motion for reduction of sentence as follows: the government shall file an opposition, stipulation, or status report by March 1, 2024. The Probation Office shall have until March 1, 2024 to file a response to defendant's motion. If the motion is opposed, defendant may file a reply brief 14 days after the opposition is filed. The motion will thereafter be submitted on the papers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.