From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hartman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 13, 2013
No. 3:00-cr-228-B (01) (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:00-cr-228-B (01)

02-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES NORMAN HARTMAN, Defendant.


ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

Defendant's motion (Doc. No. 210) is denied.

______________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hartman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 13, 2013
No. 3:00-cr-228-B (01) (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES NORMAN HARTMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

No. 3:00-cr-228-B (01) (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Reed

Proof of compliance with the terms of supervised release does not equate to "exceptionally good" behavior and…