From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harrison

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21 Cr. 190 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21 Cr. 190 (JPO)

11-30-2021

United States v. Gennie Harrison,


J. PAUL OETKEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dear Judge Oetken:

I represent Gennie Harrison in the above-referenced matter. A status conference is scheduled for December 2, 2021. We respectfully request a 60 day adjournment to continue to conduct our investigation and mitigation in this case. If convenient for the Court, we request a status conference at the end of January or beginning of February. The government and counsel for Kaitlyn Rivera have no object to this request for an adjournment. We also consent to excludable time.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully submitted, Jacqueline E. Cistaro

Granted. The December 2, 2021 pretrial conference as to defendants Harrison and Rivera is adjourned to cc: All Counsel (via electronic mail and ECF) February 2, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. The Court hereby excludes time through February 2, 2022, under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A), finding that the ends of justice outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

So ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Harrison

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21 Cr. 190 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:United States v. Gennie Harrison,

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

21 Cr. 190 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)