From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harris

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 1939
103 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1939)

Opinion

No. 8816.

April 20, 1939.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Washington, Northern Division; J. Stanley Webster, Judge.

On petition for rehearing.

For original opinion, see 100 F.2d 268.

Harry T. Davenport, of Spokane, Wash., for petitioner.

Charles E. Collett, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Sam M. Driver, U.S. Atty., of Spokane, Wash., and Thomas Harris, William D. Donnelly, and Robert H. Fabian, all of Washington, D.C.

Before HANEY, HEALY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.


In the opinion in this case it was held that the United States is entitled to have its claim allowed as a prior claim under § 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. § 191. Appellee has petitioned for rehearing on this point in view of the later decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Algoma Lumber Company, 59 S.Ct. 267, 83 L.Ed. ___.

The petition for rehearing is denied on the authority of Bramwell v. U.S. Fidelity Guaranty Company, 9 Cir., 299 F. 705, affirmed in 269 U.S. 483, 46 S.Ct. 176, 70 L.Ed. 368.

Rehearing denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Harris

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 1939
103 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1939)
Case details for

United States v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. HARRIS. In re CHINOOK LUMBER MFG. CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1939

Citations

103 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1939)