From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hanly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
No.: CR 10-474-01 WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No.: CR 10-474-01 WBS

02-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON HANLY, Defendant.

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P. C. Attorney for Defendant BRANDON HANLY BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JARED DOLAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for the United States


JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403
WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P. C.
Attorney for Defendant
BRANDON HANLY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING


Date: April 8, 2013

Ctrm: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through undersigned counsel, Jared Dolan, Assistant United States Attorney, and Joseph J. Wiseman, attorney for BRANDON HANLY, without objection from the United States Probation Officer assigned to this case, that the sentencing of Defendant now scheduled for March 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., be rescheduled to, April 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

Pursuant to this stipulation, Defendant's Written Objections shall be due March 11, 2013, Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court March 18, 2013, Defendant's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report shall be due on March 25, 2013, and Opposition/Reply to said motion shall be due on April 1, 2013.

The parties are requesting this continuance to allow counsel time to review and respond to the draft presentence report, which was just received. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

By: _______________

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN

Attorney for Defendant

BRANDON HANLY

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _______________

JARED DOLAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the sentencing in the above-captioned case be continued to April 8, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. and the other dates adjust as noted by stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hanly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
No.: CR 10-474-01 WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hanly

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON HANLY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

No.: CR 10-474-01 WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)