From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hanly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
No.: CR 10-474 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No.: CR 10-474 WBS

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON HANLY, Defendant.

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. JOSEPH J. WISEMAN Attorney for Defendant BRANDON HANLY BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JARED DOLAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for the United States


JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403
WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P. C.

1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106

Davis, California 95618

Telephone: 530.759.0700

Facsimile: 530.759.0800
Attorney for Defendant
BRANDON HANLY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING


Ctrm: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through undersigned counsel, Jared Dolan, Assistant United States Attorney, and Joseph J. Wiseman, attorney for BRANDON HANLY, without objection from the United States Probation Officer assigned to this case, that the sentencing of Defendant now scheduled for April 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., be rescheduled to, May 6, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

Pursuant to this stipulation, Defendant's informal Objections shall be due April 8, 2013; the final Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court by April 15, 2013; Defendant's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report shall be due on April 22, 2013; and the government's Opposition/Reply to said motion shall be due on April 29, 2013.

The parties are requesting this continuance to allow counsel time to review trial transcripts, which will not be available until the end of March. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

By: ________________________

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN

Attorney for Defendant

BRANDON HANLY

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ________________________

JARED DOLAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the sentencing in the above-captioned case be continued to May 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. and the other dates adjust as noted by stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hanly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
No.: CR 10-474 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hanly

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON HANLY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

No.: CR 10-474 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)