From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hampton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE SECTION
Dec 4, 2012
CRIM. CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CRIM. CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00001

12-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE HAMPTON


JUDGE TRAUGER


MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS

Comes now the Defendant, through undersigned counsel, and moves this Honorable Court for an extension of time within which to file pre-trial motions. As grounds therefore, the Defendant would show as follows:

1. Pre-trial motions are currently due on November 30, 2011. [Doc. No. 73]
2. The Defendant has a current trial date of January 15, 2013. [Doc. No. 93]
3. The Defendant has received the discovery within the last week in the superceding indictment, but has not had adequate opportunity to review it or confer with the Defendant regarding the case, the discovery or other matters.
4. At this point, in addition to determining what, if any pre-trial motions are necessary, the Defendant needs additional time to investigate the case, review all the discovery materials, consult further with the Defendant and engage the government in settlement negotiations.

Counsel has a conflict with the current trial schedule and will be filing an appropriate motion as soon as counsel has had opportunity to speak with Mr. Hampton on December 6, 2012.


Summaries of

United States v. Hampton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE SECTION
Dec 4, 2012
CRIM. CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE HAMPTON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE SECTION

Date published: Dec 4, 2012

Citations

CRIM. CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2012)