From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hammond

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2015
2:11-CR-00486-WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

          MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney

          JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III Attorney for Defendant ALEXANDER G. HAMMOND


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REMOVAL OF ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Defendant ALEXANDER G. HAMMOND, by and through his undersigned counsel, Johnny L. Griffin, III, and the United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew G. Morris, hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order authorizing on January 20, 2015 the removal of the electronic monitoring device (bracelet) from defendant, which he was previously ordered to wear as a condition of his pretrial release. This stipulation and request is based on defendant's traveling to Sumterville, Florida to commence his 30 month prison commitment.

         Specifically, defense counsel was contacted by Pretrial Service Officer Ryan Garcia and advised that on January 20, 2015 defendant will travel from his home in Bluffton, South Carolina to FCI Coleman Low in Sumterville, Florida to commence serving his 30 month prison commitment on January 21, 2015. Officer Garcia further advised that a court order is needed for the removal of the electronic monitoring device prior to defendant's travel and requested that defense counsel obtain such Order. Office Garcia also advised that he has confirmed the defendant's travel itinerary and does not oppose the removal of the electronic monitoring device on January 20, 2015. Defense counsel subsequently contacted Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Morris and advised him of the above discussions with Officer Garcia. AUSA Morris does not oppose the removal of the electronic monitoring device on January 20, 2015.

         For these reasons, the parties stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order authorizing the removal of the electronic monitoring device (bracelet) from defendant on January 20, 2015.

         ORDER

         Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby Order the removal of the electronic monitoring device (bracelet) from defendant on January 20, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Hammond

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2015
2:11-CR-00486-WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Hammond

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER G. HAMMOND, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

Citations

2:11-CR-00486-WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)