From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hamm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 27, 2012
CR. No.: 3:09-501-JFA (D.S.C. Jun. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CR. No.: 3:09-501-JFA

06-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TOBY HAMM


ORDER

The defendant has petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The government has filed a supplemental response, pointing out that the sentence of the defendant is unaffected by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, as well as the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dorsey v. United States, ____ S.Ct. ____, 2012 WL 2344463 (U.S. Supreme Court, June 21, 2012).

The court will afford the defendant an opportunity to reply to the government's supplemental response. Any reply by the defendant must be received by this court on or before July 16, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 27, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina


Summaries of

United States v. Hamm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 27, 2012
CR. No.: 3:09-501-JFA (D.S.C. Jun. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hamm

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TOBY HAMM

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 27, 2012

Citations

CR. No.: 3:09-501-JFA (D.S.C. Jun. 27, 2012)