From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hamilton

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 29, 2022
3:22-cr-79 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cr-79

06-29-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. KEONTA HAMILTON Defendant


ORDER

JEFFRY S,.FRENSLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of its obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The government is ordered to comply with Brady and its progeny. The failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court, or any other remedy that is just under the circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Hamilton

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 29, 2022
3:22-cr-79 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. KEONTA HAMILTON Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

3:22-cr-79 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)