From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hajny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Aug 21, 2015
No. 14-05022-02-CR-SW-BCW (W.D. Mo. Aug. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-05022-02-CR-SW-BCW

08-21-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GINA HAJNY, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. §636, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One and admitted to Forfeiture Allegation of the Superseding Information filed on August 21, 2015. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly. Date: August 21, 2015

/s/David P. Rush

DAVID P. RUSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within 14 days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Hajny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Aug 21, 2015
No. 14-05022-02-CR-SW-BCW (W.D. Mo. Aug. 21, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Hajny

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GINA HAJNY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 21, 2015

Citations

No. 14-05022-02-CR-SW-BCW (W.D. Mo. Aug. 21, 2015)