From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hajihashi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
3:10-cr-00260 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-cr-00260

02-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [12] FATAH HAJIHASHI [17] ANDREW KAYACHITH [22] LIBAN SHARIF OMAR [24] MOHAMED SHARIF OMAR [30] MOHAMED AHMED AMALLE


JUDGE HAYNES


UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO

ALL MOTIONS FOR EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE

The United States of America, by and through the undersigned, hereby files this response to all Motions for Jencks, Brady, and Gigilio, particularly those filed by Defendants Fatah Haji Hashi (12) (DE 1105); Andrew Kayachith (17) (DE 1135); Liban Sharif Omar (22) (DE 1081); Mohamed Sharif Omar (24) (DE 1076); and Mohamed Ahmed Amalle (30) (DE 1068).

All motions for Jencks, Brady, and Giglio are moot. This Court has ruled on this issue. (See DE, 960, p. 2 (stating "[f]or the reasons and authorities cited in the Court's Memorandum on discovery under the May 10,2010 Order, (Docket Entry No. 606)), this motion is DENIED as moot. Moreover, the Government represents that all clearly Brady, Giglio, and Jencks materials have been disclosed. The Government remains under a continuing obligation to make additional such disclosures as additional information is acquired and additional discovery is produced by the Government")).


Summaries of

United States v. Hajihashi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
3:10-cr-00260 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hajihashi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [12] FATAH HAJIHASHI [17] ANDREW KAYACHITH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

3:10-cr-00260 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2012)