From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Guzman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 22, 2020
CASE NO. 11-CR-20362-HUCK/MCALILEY (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-CR-20362-HUCK/MCALILEY

10-22-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILFER MESIAS PRIETO GUZMAN, Defendant.

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record Wilfer Mesias Prieto Guzman pro se Reg. No. 09407-104 Giles W. Dalby Correctional Institution 805 North Avenue F Post, Texas 79356


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Wilfer Mesias Prieto Guzman's ("Defendant") pro se Motion for Compassionate Release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) ("Motion") [ECF No. 50], which was filed on July 17, 2020. The Motion was referred to Magistrate Judge McAliley [ECF No. 51] for a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). In the Motion, Defendant argues that his release from prison is warranted because he suffers from diabetes and other unspecified chronic illnesses that place him at a heightened risk of contracting COVID-19. The Government responded to the Motion [ECF No. 54] on July 31, 2020.

Magistrate Judge McAliley issued the R&R [ECF No. 57] on August 17, 2020, recommending that the Court deny the Motion because Defendant failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. On September 30, 2020, Defendant filed Objections [ECF No. 58] to the R&R. The Court entered an Order Requiring the Government's Response [ECF No. 59]. Thereafter, the Government filed a Response [ECF No. 60] to the objections on October 19, 2020.

The Court has independently reviewed the record and the relevant legal authorities and is otherwise duly advised. After a de novo review, the Court agrees with the reasoning and recommendation in the R&R and therefore, adopts the R&R in full and concludes that Defendant has failed to exhaust his administrative. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that (1) the R&R [ECF No. 57] is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as part of this Order and (2) Defendant's pro se Motion for Compassionate Release [ECF No. 50] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida on October 22, 2020.

/s/_________

Paul C. Huck

United States District Judge Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record Wilfer Mesias Prieto Guzman pro se
Reg. No. 09407-104
Giles W. Dalby Correctional Institution
805 North Avenue F
Post, Texas 79356


Summaries of

United States v. Guzman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 22, 2020
CASE NO. 11-CR-20362-HUCK/MCALILEY (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILFER MESIAS PRIETO GUZMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 22, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 11-CR-20362-HUCK/MCALILEY (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Varela

see also United States v. Guzman, No. 11-CR-20362, 2020 WL 6214093, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 17, 2020), report…

United States v. Barbieri

Barbieri concedes that he did not appeal the warden's decision through the Administrative Remedy Program and…